
Yesterday was the Twelfth Day of Christmas. Today we reflect on the end of Christmas season with a poem by W.H. Auden.
Well, so that is that. Now we must dismantle the tree,— W. H. Auden
TweetFrom : Common Prayer: A Liturgy for Ordinary Radicals
Tweet
Tweet

From : Common Prayer: A Liturgy for Ordinary Radicals
To you is born this day in the city of David a savior, who is Christ, the Lord… (Luke 2:11)
Well, it’s almost over.
If your house is like mine, there is a sluggish satisfaction at the end of an eventful day. The living room and the dining room table both evidence the reality of abundance and generosity. Once again, we have wrapped ourselves in the familiar stories and traditions of Christmas.
Even our house of worship has the feeling of wearied fullness. When I left the sanctuary this morning, there were drips of candle wax in seldom-used pews and stacks upon stacks of bulletins waiting to be recycled.
We have embraced and encountered the mystery of incarnation – and, while we feel, somehow, closer to God and one another through that encounter, we still wonder what it all means…
Madeline L’Engle writes:
[My problem with Christmas] lies not in secularism, not in Santa Clauses with cotton beards, not in loudspeakers blatting out [inane] Christmas carols, not in shops full of people pushing and shouting and swearing at each other as they struggle to buy overpriced Christmas presents.
No, its not the secular world which presents me with problems at Christmas…it’s God.
Cribb’d, cabined, and confined within the contours of a human infant. The infinite defined by the finite? The Creator of all life thirsty and abandoned? Why would God do such a thing? (From “The Irrational Season,” Chapter 2)
And the answer, of course, is love.
Perhaps we will never grasp the what, or the how of Christmas. Those types of understandings are lost in the brightness of incarnation’s mystery.
But we can grasp the why. We know why God chose to enter the finite, human, real world in the person of Jesus Christ. It is because of love…the love of the Creator for the creation. The love of the Redeemer for those in need of grace. The love of the Sustainer for those charged with spreading this love to the whole world.
Merry Christmas!
Today’s Christmas reflection was written by Pen Peery, Pastor, First Presbyterian Church, Shreveport
TweetWe have become so accustomed to the idea of divine love and of God’s coming at Christmas that we no longer feel the shiver of fear the God’s coming should arouse in us. We are indifferent to the message, taking only the pleasant and agreeable out of it and forgetting the serious aspect, that the God of the world draws near to the people of our little earth and lays claim to us. The coming of God is truly not only glad tidings, but first of all frightening news for everyone who has a conscience.
— Dietrich Bonhoeffer
TweetThe tamed piety of the conventional church wants an innocent baby who comes gently into our secure lives and keeps everything benign and friendly. It may be conventional and it may be tame, but it is not biblical and it is not Christian. Advent is about both hope and hurt; pain and risk, as well as excitement and joy, are part of the adventure. Christ comes touching those deep places our culture too quickly covers over with glitzy wrapping paper and “Frosty, the Snowman.”
Kyle Childress quoted in Sacred Seasons: Advent/Christmas 2011 by Seeds of Hope Publishers
TweetEverything in our society teaches us to move away from suffering, to move out of neighborhoods where there is high crime, to move away from people who don’t look like us. But the gospel calls us to something altogether different. We are to laugh at fear, to lean into suffering, to open ourselves to the stranger. Advent is the season when we remember that Jesus put on flesh and moved into the neighborhood. God’s getting born in a barn reminds us that God shows up even in the forsaken corners of the earth.
From: Shane Claiborne, Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove and Enuma Okoro in Common Prayer: A Liturgy for Ordinary Radicals
Tweet“The wind blows where it chooses, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.” John 3:8
Sometimes the pace of change in our world can take your breath away. As we approach Pentecost, we wanted to spend some time with the Holy Spirit, the future of the Church—universal, PC(USA) and 900 Jordan—and the subject of change.
It seems like everyone in the Church today is clamoring for change. Some want change that takes us back to 1960. Others want to see change around the edges: doing what we already do but doing it better. Some want radical change in the way we “do church.” Almost no one believes that maintaining the status quo is an option for the church.
The readings we have attached come from a variety of sources and perspectives. One looks at the church and sees that “Our system is perfectly designed to maintain the status quo.” Are there structural changes that need to be made to the church’s way of going about its calling? What might that mean for the way a session or church committee goes about its work? How do we create a space for the Holy Spirit to work in the church? A pdf of this article is at Structures or you can access it at http://pcusa-oga.typepad.com/mgbcomm/2011/05/from-the-the-mgb-commission-observation-deck-8.html
Brian McLaren challenges the church to think in terms of “refounding” instead of preserving, renewing or restoring. If we were to pursue that sort of change, what would it look like for our church? What would have to change? If change by its nature involves some loss, are we willing to choose change anyway? You can read more from Brian and McLaren and watch an interview with him at: http://www.pcusa.org/news/2010/12/10/brian-mclaren-looks-future/
If “refounding” is beyond our capacity for change, what innovations can we make in the way we carry out our calling? Does change require a change in our identity and understanding of our mission?
As we approach completion of the Fulfilling the Vision project, how will this essentially new facility affect our ministry? Will anything change upon completion of the project? If so, what should those changes look like?
Read the materials and reflect on the questions they raise for you and the church. Will the “Lord, the giver of life” yet again breathe life into the church as it did at Pentecost?
Tweet